Our Blog

Ongoing observations by End Point people

Using nginx to transparently modify/debug third-party content

By David Christensen · Sunday, February 6, 2011

Tags: browsers, camps, interchange, javascript, linux, testing, tips

In tracking down a recent front-end bug for one of our client sites, I found myself needing to use the browser's JavaScript debugger for stepping through some JavaScript code that lived in a mix of domains; this included a third-party framework as well as locally-hosted code which interfaced with -- and potentially interfered with -- said third-party code. (We'll call said code foo.min.js for the purposes of this article.) The third-party code was a feature that was integrated into the client site using a custom domain name and was hosted and controlled by the third-party service with no ability for us to change directly. The custom domain name was part of a chain of CNAMEs which eventually pointed to the underlying actual IP of the third-party service, so their infrastructure obviously relied on getting the Host header correctly in the request to select which among many clients was being served.

It appeared as if there was a conflict between code on our site and that imported by the third party service. As part of the debugging process, I was stepping through the JavaScript in order to determine what if any conflicts there were, as well as their nature (e.g., conflicting library definitions, etc.). Stepping through our code was fine, however the third-party's JS code was (a) unfamiliar, and (b) minified, so this had the effect of putting all of the JavaScript code more-or-less on one line, which made tracing through the code in the debugger much less useful than I had hoped.

My first instinct was to use a JavaScript beautifier to reverse the minification process, but since I had no control over the code being included from the third-party service, this did not seem to be directly feasible. The third-party code was deployed only on our production site and relied on hard-coded domains which would make integrating it into one of our development instances challenging since we had no control over the contents of the returned resources. Since the relevant feature (and subsequent bugs) was only on the production site, making extensive modifications to how things were done and potentially breaking that or other features for users while I was debugging was obviously out as an option.

Enter nginx. I've been doing a lot with nginx lately as far as using it as a reverse proxy cache, so it's been on my mind lately. So I came up with this technique:

  1. Look up the IP address for the third-party's domain name (used for later purposes).
  2. Install nginx on localhost, listening to port 80.
  3. Modify /etc/hosts to point the third-party's domain name to the nginx server's IP (also localhost in this case).
  4. Configure a new virtual host with the following logical constraints:

    - We want to serve specific files (the beautified JavaScript) from our local server. - We want any other request going through that domain to be passed-through transparently, so neither the browser nor the third-party server treat it differently.

Given these constraints, this is the minimal configuration that I came up with (the interesting parts are located in the server block):




worker_processes 1;

events {
    worker_connections 10;

http {
    include       mime.types;
    default_type  application/octet-stream;

    server {
        server_name example.domain.com;
        root /path/to/local_root;

        try_files $uri @proxied;

        location @proxied {
            proxy_set_header Host $http_host;

Once I had the above configured/setup, I downloaded/saved the foo.min.js file from the third-party service, ran it through a JS beautifier, and saved it in the local nginx's cache root so it would be served up instead of the actual file from the third-party service. Any other requests for static resources (images, other scripts, etc) would pass-through to the third-party server, so I had my nicely-formatted JavaScript code to step through, the production site worked as normal for anyone else despite potential local changes to the file on my end (i.e., adding JavaScript alert() calls to the file, and no one was the wiser.

A few notes

The try_files directive instructs nginx to first look for a file named after the current URI (foo.min.js in our example) in our local cache, and if this is not found, then fallback to the proxied location block; i.e., relay the request to the original upstream server. We explicitly set the Host header on the proxy request because we want the request to behave normally with respect to name-based hosting, and provide the saved IP address to contact the server in question.

We only needed to preserve/lookup the upstream server's IP address because we're running the nginx server on localhost, so if we used a domain name the lookup would return the same IP defined in /etc/hosts; if the nginx server was running on a different machine, you would be able to just use the domain name as both the server_name and the proxy_pass parameters and set the entry for the host in your local /etc/hosts file to the IP of the nginx server.

A possible extension would be to detect when an upstream request matched a minified URL (via a location ~ .min..*.js$ block) and automatically beautify/cache the content in our local cache. This could be accomplished via the use of an external FastCGI script to retrieve, post-process, and cache the content.

This technique can also be used when dealing with testing changes to a production site on which you are unable or unwilling to make potentially disruptive changes for the purposes of testing static resources. (JavaScript seems the most obvious application here, but this could apply to serving up images or other static content which would be resolvable by the local cache.)

I always need to remind myself to undo changes to /etc/hosts as soon as I'm done testing when using tricks like these. Particularly in something like this which is more-or-less transparent, the behavior would be functionaly identical as long as code/scripts on the third-party site stayed the same, but could easily introduce subtle bugs if the third-party services made changes to their codebase. Since our local copies would mask any remote changes for those non-proxied resources, this could be very confusing if you forget that things are set up this way.